I’ve been using the AI for the last couple of years, both in my personal life and in my professional life. And, like others, I’ve been using some of the common editors. Among them, one of my favorites is Cursor AI Editor. The reason is very simple. It has a agent driven capability where anyone can develop their application (you need to take the paid plan – off course).
So, in this case, you don’t need to worry about which model you should use as Cursor will do it for you.
Even when this is a great editor for the developers. Still, I felt that one thing is missing is to restore to one of your previous versions in case the new code generates wrong or creates a bug for other areas of your application. This capability is extremely important for me. And, many times, I literally had to spend significant hours trying to restore the previous desired working versions or at least get that version of code & restore it easily all across the board, along with the entire history of changes. Connecting with GitHub may solve the problem if you push your code. However, developers push their code when they feel like achieving some milestones. The do not push intermediate changes while developing the features or capabilities. And, that’s where my new package will fit & work efficiently in conjunction with the Cursor AI Editor. Apart from that, it compresses the entire context apart from maintainign the individual versions of context. So, you can rollback to a certain level or can continue with the latest comprehensive context that is captured within the Graphify package.
Let us understand how that works. But, before that let us understand the demo.
So, as you can see from the above video, I am able to showcase the complete capabilities. Not only are you maintaining an external way of viewing all the prompts along with the entire history, but you can also compare the versions of a single script or even between prompts.
So, you are getting an overall comprehensive picture.
Now, let us deep-dive into some of the major choices user can have.
From the above picture, we have five major sections. The top-right in CYAN shows two tabs – “Graph” & “Versions”. As per the last screenshot, the “Graph” tab is active.
The top-left contains the available options in RED, that has all the options. Initially, by default, it is set to “All types”.
The main YELLOW square-line box contains the main canvas area, which depicts the graphical flow of metadata information.
The GREEN square-line box contains the legend information. And, the lower bottom-right contains the entire codebase for the scripts, packages, & for others.
Another very important capability is to check the entire prompt history in an organized way. This will help people to understand the evolution of the products. The above picture depicts this by showing the highlighted square-line boxes.
Another very important capability is to isolate only the scripts & create a similar graphical representation. This will give developers a cleaner interface to concentrate on the evolution of the scripts rather than concentrating on everything. The highlighted square-line box showcases the selected options & the corresponding script details.
The last important tool is under the “Versions” tab. In this tab, developers have the option to select any target script & then compare the two versions within the evolution & then based on the understanding, either they can enhance/update or restore that specific version in the latest version. This will definitely give developer much needed flexibility.
The above square-line boxes highlight the script name, and the comparison intention between the two certain versions & then the difference between them at the bottom of the screen.
So, we’ve done it. In our next post, we’ll know some of the key snippets from the important scripts for a better understanding of this tool.
I hope you all like this effort & let me know your feedback. I’ll be back with another topic. Until then, Happy Avenging!
Note: All the data & scenarios posted here are representative of data & scenarios available on the internet for educational purposes only. There is always room for improvement in this kind of model & the solution associated with it. This article is for educational purposes only. The techniques described should only be used for authorized security testing and research. Unauthorized access to computer systems is illegal and unethical & not encouraged.
You must be logged in to post a comment.